22.04.2025 13:52
In the incident that took place in Çorum, the Court of Cassation found the husband, who addressed his wife as "gypsy" and "gypsy woman," to be at fault. The Court ruled that the man must pay his wife 15,000 lira in moral compensation and a monthly alimony of 10,000 lira.
```html
A person living in Çorum filed for divorce, stating that his wife left the house 14 days after their marriage, insulted him during the marriage, and exhibited provocative behavior. He also mentioned that the child from his wife's first marriage displayed aggressive and disrespectful behavior towards him.
WOMAN FILED A COUNTER LAWSUIT SAYING "SHE CALLS ME GYPSY"
The defendant woman, on the other hand, stated that her husband's claims were legally unfounded and did not reflect the truth. She argued that throughout their short marriage, he opposed every word and action of hers, caused arguments, insulted her by calling her "gypsy" and "gypsy woman," and claimed that he kicked her out of the house, thus filing a counter lawsuit.
WILL PAY 15 THOUSAND TL COMPENSATION AND 10 THOUSAND TL ALIMONY MONTHLY
The Çorum 2nd Family Court determined that the man who insulted and demeaned the woman by calling her "gypsy" acted faultily, and that the man's claims could not be proven. The court ruled to reject the man's lawsuit and accepted the woman's case, deciding to divorce the parties due to the "fundamental disruption of the marriage union," and ordered the man to pay the woman 15 thousand TL in moral compensation and 10 thousand TL in monthly alimony.
SUPREME COURT APPROVED THE DECISION
Upon the appeal, the Supreme Court's 2nd Civil Chamber examined the file and determined that there was no procedural or substantive violation in the local court's decision, deciding to uphold the ruling.
The chamber's decision stated, "The decision examined on appeal is in accordance with the procedure and law based on the mutual claims and defenses of the parties, the documents they relied on, the legal rules applicable to the dispute, the qualification of the legal relationship, the conditions of the case, the rules of procedure and evidence, and the justifications stated in the decision. The reasons put forward in the man's appeal petition were not deemed sufficient to necessitate the annulment of the decision."
```