12.10.2026 18:07
In the investigation into the incident in Sakarya in which 14-year-old Murat İmrağ lost his life, striking correspondence was found on the phone of the arrested suspect. It was determined that days before the incident, the suspect asked artificial intelligence questions about which weapons could be lethal and how many years he would serve in prison if he killed someone.
Striking details have emerged in the investigation into the death of 14-year-old Murat İmrağ, who lost his life after being shot in the head at a house in the Arifiye district of Sakarya, where he was staying for his older sister's birthday. In an examination of the phone of 15-year-old Y.D.S., who was arrested over the incident, it was determined that he asked an artificial intelligence application questions about the effects of weapons, the penalty for killing someone, and the right of self-defense.
PHOTOS TAKEN BEFORE THE INCIDENT WERE EXAMINED In the incident that occurred on July 24 in Ahmediye Neighborhood of Arifiye district, Murat İmrağ lost his life as a result of the firing of a licensed pistol belonging to 70-year-old F.K. The mobile phone of Y.D.S., who was arrested in connection with the incident, was taken into examination as part of the investigation.
After the examination carried out by the teams of the Provincial Gendarmerie Command's Cyber Crimes Division Directorate, the file was also evaluated by the Gendarmerie Crime Investigation Team (JASAT).
During the examination, it was determined that in a photograph determined to have been taken on March 20, there were two pistols and a magazine on the table in the room. In the photograph, another boy, assessed to be the same age as Y.D.S., was seen sitting next to the table.
In another photograph dated April 9 added to the file, in the image assessed to have been taken in the house where the incident occurred, it was stated that it showed the moment when the child thought to be Y.D.S. held the pistol grip with his right hand and pulled the slide of the weapon with his left hand.
Murat İmrağ HE ASKED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONS ABOUT WEAPONS AND PUNISHMENT In the phone examination, the correspondence of Y.D.S. with an artificial intelligence application on July 11 drew attention. It was determined that the suspect asked various questions about the injuriousness of weapons, the legal consequences of killing someone, and self-defense.
It was reported that the following questions were included in the correspondence:
- “Which weapon should I shoot him with for the man to die?”
- “How much punishment would I get if I shoot with a rifle?”
- “Does a shotgun hurt?”
- “Does a blank-firing gun hurt?”
- “If I kill someone, how many years in prison would I serve?”
It was determined that in the suspect's correspondence on the same day, he also asked, “Does a Glock hurt?”, “If we see someone harassing a girl and kill him, how many years in prison would we get, or would we get prison?” and “If I kill a man who hit my mother, would I go to prison?”
It was also determined that Y.D.S. asked questions about what self-defense is, to whom life imprisonment is given, and the meaning of execution. The correspondence also included statements in which he asked what he would face if he surrendered to the police after beating someone.
HE ALSO ASKED A QUESTION SIX DAYS BEFORE THE INCIDENT In the phone examination, it was also determined that Y.D.S. asked the artificial intelligence application on July 18, “Does the devil load an empty weapon?”
It was determined that the suspect also asked questions about the criminal organization known as the Daltons and the organization's leader. It was reported that the correspondence and photographs in question were included in the investigation file.
MOTHER: I WILL DEFEND MY SON'S RIGHTS TO THE END Yeliz İmrağ, the mother of Murat İmrağ, who lost his life, stated that she did not believe the claims that her son's death was suicide and claimed that the suspect confessed to the crime.
Yeliz İmrağ Mother İmrağ, arguing that the incident was being tried to be shown as an accident, stated that the file contained gang-related correspondence and photographs taken with a weapon.
Emphasizing that she would seek her son's rights to the end, İmrağ said she thought the incident may have been planned. The mother, who claimed that the suspect cleaned himself and gunpowder traces shortly after the incident, argued that this indicated that preparations had been made in advance.
FATHER: WE THINK HE DID RESEARCH BEFORE THE INCIDENT Father Özkan İmrağ also claimed that the suspect had carried out various research before the incident. Stating that hand swab samples were taken by teams on the day of the incident, father İmrağ claimed that his son's fingerprint was not found on the weapon and that no swab trace was found on the suspect either.
Özkan İmrağ Within the scope of the investigation, the examination of the correspondence, photographs, and other findings obtained from the mobile phone continues.