11.11.2026 14:10
In the case concerning the death of singer Güllü, Sultan Nur Ulu, who faces up to 4 years in prison on charges of perjury, appeared before the judge. Claiming that Tuğyan Ülkem Gülter threatened and put pressure on her, Ulu said, "I was afraid she could pin the crime on me." Ulu's lawyer, on the other hand, made a striking allegation with the words, "They launched an operation to save Tuğyan."
Sultan Nur Ulu's lawyer Erol Özgüç made a statement to members of the press after the hearing. Calling the criminal complaint filed a ‘rescue operation’ for Tuğyan Ülkem Gülter, Özgüç said:
“They have launched a rescue operation for Tuğyan. Now it is the turn of those who love Ms. Güllü. We have waged the necessary struggle. The judicial control decision has been lifted. The court decided to wait for the finalization of the outcome of the case before the 1st High Criminal Court. They are trying to do in this file what they could not do in the murder file. Therefore, the documents and evidence submitted to the current file are entirely documents aimed at rescuing Tuğyan.”
"WE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WITH EXPERT REPORTS"
Tuğberk Gülter's lawyer Rahmi Çelik stated that they filed a criminal complaint with expert reports, and said: “We filed a criminal complaint with expert reports prepared by our side. In our view, suspicions have arisen in this criminal complaint. This does not mean that he is guilty or innocent. Since there is a suspicious situation, the judicial authorities must eliminate this suspicion. For that reason, we requested that the result of the criminal complaint we filed be awaited, just as the court awaits the decision in the file at the high criminal court. My colleague described this move as a statement of ‘rescuing Tuğyan.’ We absolutely do not accept this. In the criminal complaint we filed, we say that there was participation in the offense.”
"WE ARE HERE ON BEHALF OF ALL MOTHERS AND MS. GÜLLÜ"
Tuğberk Yağız Gülter’s lawyer Mert Erdoğan, on the other hand, stated that they were continuing the case on behalf of all mothers, and said: “There are different technical reports later submitted to the file by Mustafa Arapoğlu Hoca. These are in the nature of new evidence. These reports were not prepared with the intent to acquit or accuse anyone. First of all, we are continuing this file to the end on behalf of all mothers and the late Güllü.”
Tuğberk Yağız Gülter also stated that he did not agree with the statements of Sultan Nur Ulu’s lawyer Erol Özgüç in bringing up at the hearing his correspondence regarding the alleged artificial intelligence conversation directed at him, ‘Can audio be added to the footage later?’, and spoke as follows:
“I invite him to examine my correspondence with artificial intelligence, about which statements were made about me, including what came before and after those correspondences. If he examines them, he himself will understand how and why those correspondences happened. At the hearing, we stated that there was complicity. I am one of the first complainants at the 1st High Criminal Court. We do not agree with his statements.”