31.01.2026 22:20
The documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice revealed unverified FBI tips regarding U.S. President Donald Trump. The documents allege that Trump committed sexual assault against a minor, bringing discussions about the political and legal dimensions of the Epstein case back to the forefront.
The final section of the Jeffrey Epstein files published by the U.S. Department of Justice has made headlines worldwide due to serious allegations against U.S. President Donald Trump. Some statements in the documents point to unverified reports suggesting that Trump was involved in the sexual assault of a minor girl in the 1990s.
SPECIAL COMPLAINTS MADE TO THE FBI
Among the files published regarding the Epstein investigation are summaries of complaints made to the FBI and tip notes. Some texts claim that Trump sexually assaulted a girl approximately 13-14 years old, detailing the related incidents.
These statements are not considered direct accusations; the files are often categorized as "unverified tips," and it is unclear whether they have been evaluated as official evidence within the scope of the investigation.
REMOVAL OF THE DOCUMENT AND PUBLICATION CONTROVERSY
The U.S. Department of Justice's decision to first publish some documents containing tips and then remove them from access has also become one of the focal points of the controversy. The relevant content was briefly made public and then restructured and republished.
STATEMENTS FROM OFFICIALS
It has been reported that the Department of Justice described some allegations as sensational and unverified, and that Trump made official statements indicating that such allegations lack concrete evidence from a defense perspective. Additionally, it was reported that the FBI assessed that there is no clear evidence of a "strong name list" in the files.
The publication of new documents has resonated widely in both social media and politics. The debate continues not only over the content of the documents but also regarding the application of principles of transparency and openness. Some legal experts advocate for the complete publication of all files, while the defense emphasizes that "the allegations should not be published without verification."
NOT ACCEPTED AS ACCUSATIONS
Currently, the allegations in question are not officially considered criminal charges; they are recorded in the files as tips made to the FBI and statements from certain individuals. Therefore, unless the reality of the allegations is proven by an independent court decision or an official investigation, they are not legally regarded as accusations.