05.12.2025 11:46
A statement by a female lawyer regarding divorce cases, saying "Spending one night in the same house with someone of the opposite sex is sufficient evidence for adultery," has sparked significant debate on social media. The lawyer also noted that relationships with someone of the same sex or with animals are not legally considered adultery.
The words of a lawyer evaluating divorce cases have become a hot topic on social media. The lawyer claimed that spending a night in the same house with someone of the opposite sex, even if there is a familial relationship, is sufficient for an accusation of adultery.
"EVEN IF THEY ARE YOUR RELATIVE..."
The female lawyer stated in her explanation, "Spending one night in the same house with someone of the opposite sex, even if they are your relative, is sufficient for adultery. It serves as evidence in a divorce case filed for adultery without the need for proof of sexual intercourse."
"HAVING SEX WITH AN ANIMAL IS NOT CONSIDERED ADULTERY"
In her continued explanation, the female lawyer noted that sexual relations with someone of the same sex or with an animal are not legally considered adultery, stating, "Having sexual relations with someone of the same sex or with an animal is not considered adultery."
SPARKED A DEBATE ON SOCIAL MEDIA
The remarks in question quickly sparked intense debate on social media. While some users criticized the lawyer's legal approach, others argued that the statements could lead to misunderstandings.