Haberler   
  English   
  Kurdî   
  En.Haberler.Com - Latest News
SEARCH IN NEWS:
  HOME PAGE 22/10/2024 06:28 
News  > 

A precedent decision has been made: This statement will be considered sexual harassment.

A precedent decision has been made: This statement will be considered sexual harassment.

21.10.2024 20:20

The incident in which a boss in England insulted an employee by calling him 'bald' and subsequently fired him marked the beginning of a new era. The labor court stated that calling men 'bald' is a sexist insult and falls under the scope of sexual harassment. This decision set an important precedent regarding gender equality and respect in the workplace.

An extraordinary event took place in England. A labor court ruled that calling a man bald is a sexist insult and falls under the scope of sexual harassment. This interesting incident sparked an important discussion about gender equality and respect in the workplace. An interesting event occurred in England. Calling a man bald was considered sexual harassment. The UK Supreme Court stated that calling a man bald is equivalent to commenting on a woman's breasts, categorizing it as sexual harassment. This decision created a significant precedent regarding gender equality and respect in the workplace. In an incident that took place in 2021, a dispute arose between a boss and an employee. During the argument, the boss used the term bald towards the employee and subsequently fired him. The employee claimed that he was unfairly dismissed by his boss and took the case to court. The court noted that the term bald could violate equality laws and that it is a gender-related insult. The judge emphasized that the nature of the term bald is inherently gender-related, stating that such expressions turn into a humiliation directed solely at men.

Precedent decision made: The term 'bald' was considered sexual harassment

CONTRIBUTION TO GENDER EQUALITY

Although the company's lawyers argued that calling male individuals bald does not fall under sexual harassment, the court decided that commenting on a man's baldness should be evaluated in the same way as commenting on a woman's body. The judge stated, "To be gender-related, it must be applied to that gender by excluding the other gender." The court expressed that due to the fact that most bald individuals are men, the term is perceived as a sexist insult when used against a man. The judge articulated that commenting on men's hair loss is the same as discussing the size of women's breasts. This landmark decision once again highlighted that sexist language and behavior in the workplace are unacceptable, contributing to the struggle for gender equality.



 
Latest News





 
 
Top News