16.10.2026 08:32
An objection came from his lawyer against the bankruptcy decision issued about Murat Cemcir's production company. His lawyer, stating that the notification did not reach the company and that the right to defense could not be exercised, announced that legal applications had been made against the decision.
After the bankruptcy ruling issued regarding Murat Cemcir’s production company, a statement came from his lawyer. Stating that the notification did not reach the company and therefore the right to defense could not be exercised, his lawyer announced that legal applications have been made against the ruling.
An objection was filed against the bankruptcy ruling issued regarding TR 40 33 Film Yapım Bilişim Organizasyon Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., owned by actor Murat Cemcir. Cemcir’s lawyer reported that the grounds for the ruling and the judicial process are being examined from a legal perspective.
“THE COMPANY WAS UNAWARE OF THE PROCESS”
In the statement, it was argued that the follow-up process proceeded without the knowledge of the company and its officials. It was stated that no notification was received, and it was said, “The company was unaware of the process.” Therefore, it was expressed that the company could not present its defense and could not exercise its legal rights.
LEGAL APPLICATION AGAINST THE RULING
It was announced that the necessary legal remedy applications have been made against the rulings issued in the absence of the company, and legal initiatives regarding the notification procedures have also been initiated.
While it was stated that the process affected Cemcir’s and his company’s commercial reputation, it was noted that efforts will continue to remedy the losses of rights.