05.05.2025 08:30
In the Super League, Fenerbahçe lost 1-0 at home to Beşiktaş. The controversial moments of the match were evaluated by the Trio team. Regarding the situation where En Nesyri fell to the ground, Fenerbahçe's penalty expectation was assessed by the Trio team, and it was stated that the decision to continue the game was correct.
Trendyol Super League, Fenerbahçe lost 1-0 to Beşiktaş at home. The trio team of Bülent Yıldırım, Bahattin Duran, and Deniz Çoban commented on the controversial positions.
In the Trendyol Super League, Fenerbahçe lost 1-0 to Beşiktaş at home. The goal for the black and whites was scored by Gedson Fernandes. The trio team of Bülent Yıldırım, Bahattin Duran, and Deniz Çoban commented on the controversial positions.
11' Is the referee's decision to continue after İsmail Yüksek's foul on Amir Hadziahmetovic correct?
Bülent Yıldırım: The referee missed this. Considering the first fouls, this was the most severe foul. A yellow card was missed.
Bahattin Duran: Even though he intervened with his right foot, it should have been a foul and a yellow card.
Deniz Çoban: İsmail's action was a foul that warranted a yellow card. The referee didn't even call a foul here.
36' Is it the right decision to award a penalty to Beşiktaş after the ball hit Talisca's hand?
Bülent Yıldırım: There is no foul in the position. Talisca took a risk. The referee unhesitatingly awarded a penalty. The referee deserves to be congratulated.
Bahattin Duran: Talisca took a risk in the position. He is holding his right hand up openly. Talisca's stance is very risky. Even if he hadn't handled the ball, if Mustafa had pressed a little more on his neck, it would still be a penalty.
Deniz Çoban: It's a clear penalty. While Gedson and Çağlar were trying to gain space, there was contact with İrfan, but no violation. Even if Mustafa pulls Talisca's shorts, there is no violation. Undoubtedly a penalty. I congratulate the referee for making the call on the field. There is no violation in Gedson's intervention on İrfan.
37' Fenerbahçe expected a penalty in the position where En Nesyri fell to the ground. Is the decision to continue correct?
Bülent Yıldırım: The goalkeeper is playing with the ball. There is contact after En Nesyri extends his foot. This is a position that requires the referee's interpretation. I support the decision to continue.
Bahattin Duran: Mert Müldür's action is a yellow card. The yellow card shown to Çağlar by the referee is correct. After the goalkeeper Mert played with the ball, En Nesyri tried to take the ball with the inside of his left foot. I think En Nesyri made contact with Mert carelessly. The position is not a penalty. En Nesyri fouled the goalkeeper.
Deniz Çoban: I can't say it's not a clear penalty. He played with the ball; it's not a position that should end there. I think the position is not a penalty. The ball comes to the Beşiktaş goalkeeper before it reaches En Nesyri. The Beşiktaş goalkeeper plays the ball cleanly with the top of his foot. The late Fenerbahçe player comes in with his foot open to get a penalty. The Beşiktaş goalkeeper pulls his feet back to reduce the contact. A contact occurs. If the Beşiktaş player hadn't been cautious with his feet or if En Nesyri had swept through, I would say it's undoubtedly a penalty. The referee did not bend at all in the objections. After the position continued, there was a clear yellow card that Mert Müldür missed before Çağlar's objection.