Is the red card correct? Former referees unanimously agreed on the decision that marked the match.

Is the red card correct? Former referees unanimously agreed on the decision that marked the match.

17.03.2025 09:50

The beIN Trio team evaluated the decisions of referee Cihan Aydın following the Fenerbahçe-Samsunspor match. Former referees Deniz Çoban, Bahattin Duran, and Bülent Yıldırım unanimously agreed on the red card issued to Samsunspor's Marius, which had a significant impact on the match.

```html

The beIn Trio team evaluated the decisions of referee Cihan Aydın after the Fenerbahçe-Samsunspor match, which ended in a 0-0 draw. Former referees Deniz Çoban, Bahattin Duran, and Bülent Yıldırım agreed on the red card issued to Samsunspor's Marius, which was a decisive moment in the match.



MARIUS' FIRST YELLOW CARD





  • In the 3rd minute, there was a move by Dzeko, Talisca was expecting a foul, was Marius' yellow card after the foul on Skriniar correct?




Deniz Çoban: In 40 seconds, the referee made 3 mistakes. Dzeko's foul, the clear foul on Talisca, and a foul on Skriniar without any action that would require a foul, followed by a yellow card. You don't have the luxury of making this many mistakes in 40 seconds.



Bahattin Duran: The referee started hesitantly. Dzeko's foul should not be a yellow card. The foul on Talisca should not be a yellow card either. Marius' knee came to the ankle at most, it was a careless foul. Marius' yellow card is definitely wrong.



Bülent Yıldırım: Dzeko made a foul with the tip of his cleat. There is a blow to Talisca's right knee. Marius' knee at most hit the heel. It should not be a card.







Is the red card correct? Former referees agreed on the decision that marked the match

IMAGE: BEIN SPORTS






FENERBAHÇE'S EXPECTED RED CARD POSITION





  • In the 15th minute, was the referee's decision correct in Fred's challenge with Marius?




Deniz Çoban: The referee called a foul in this position. The referee made 5-7 foul mistakes in 15 minutes. This is unacceptable. Fred is playing the ball and playing cleanly. Marius is the one hitting uncontrollably. Marius should receive a yellow card. Marius has a card. Is Fred guilty because he stole the ball? He is the one getting hit.



Bahattin Duran: Fred is playing the ball clearly and cleanly. His aim is to hit the ball, but Marius knows Fred is there. Marius swings his leg uncontrollably. He should have received a card here. Marius should have received his first yellow card here. Marius currently has a card, and it will be a second yellow card. The first card he received was wrong.



Bülent Yıldırım: Marius should not have received a yellow card. After the ball was stolen, the inside of his cleat came in. Is it an uncontrolled foul? Not in my opinion. Just a foul.







Is the red card correct? Former referees agreed on the decision that marked the match

IMAGE: BEIN SPORTS






HOLSE-AMRABAT CHALLENGE, IS IT A PENALTY?





  • Was the decision to continue correct for Holse, who fell after the challenge with Amrabat?




Bahattin Duran: Amrabat is next to Holse, there is a slight pull on a shirt. There is also contact between the feet. For me, the decision to continue is correct. No penalty.



Deniz Çoban: Holse's next move is not affected. There is contact with the left foot, but Holse is stepping down with his right foot, choosing to fall while trying to step with his left foot. The decision to continue is correct. This was the first correct decision in the 25th minute.



Bülent Yıldırım: The decision to continue is correct.







Is the red card correct? Former referees agreed on the decision that marked the match

IMAGE: BEIN SPORTS






DID ZEKİ YAVRU HANDLE THE BALL IN KOSTIC'S SHOT?





  • Did Zeki Yavru handle the ball in Kostic's shot, was the decision to continue correct?




Deniz Çoban: Defenders often make this move in the world. This is not a natural position. If he is widening his body while doing this, it is a penalty, but we cannot talk about widening here. His arm opens after the moment of contact with the ball. The ball hit his arm and body at the same time, and his arm opened due to the speed of the ball. The decision to continue is correct.



Bahattin Duran: Making this move is always risky. You opened your elbows, this is a violation. You came with your elbows open, this is also a violation. Zeki's right elbow is open, his left elbow is close to his body. It is not a natural position, but is he widening his body? Is there intent in the movement? The elbow is as close to the body as possible. It opens when the ball hits. I say definitely continue.



Bülent Yıldırım: If the elbow was open, it would have been a penalty, but in this case, I also think continuing is correct.







Is the red card correct? Former referees agreed on the decision that marked the match

IMAGE: BEIN SPORTS






IS MARIUS' RED CARD CORRECT?





  • Is the decision to expel Marius correct?




Deniz Çoban: The referee had both correct and incorrect decisions. He made mistakes while applying the correct decisions. There is a clear foul, I think it should be a yellow card, the player's lip was cut. He did not call that foul. He continued. The player wants to communicate with you. The person in front of you is the authority there, you are grabbing his arm and turning him saying 'look at me'. You cannot do that. Cihan Aydın also has administrative faults. He missed the foul. The player is coming to communicate with you, and you turn your back and walk away. Are you avoiding the decision you made, or are you avoiding seeing the player's cut lip?



Bülent Yıldırım: The main problem of the current generation is that they have no idea about communication. There is no art of management. While showing the card during the communication, he turns his back and walks away. Where are you going, man! If you look at the result, it is correct. You cannot treat authority like this. The one who is hurt, the one who is hit is him, listen to him. Marius' red card is technically correct. Marius' first yellow card is also wrong.



Bahattin Duran: Marius does not need to push, the action he made is a yellow card. If Marius pushes the referee, it would be a direct red. There is no problem there. Skriniar made a clear foul before. The referee missed that.







Is the red card correct? Former referees agreed on the decision that marked the match

IMAGE: BEIN SPORTS






DISPUTES AT THE END OF THE MATCH



Deniz Çoban: If there is something that requires expulsion or discipline here, the referee should have punished it, but he did not.



```Sure! Here is the translated text while preserving the original HTML structure, including the translations for the `title` and `alt` attributes in the `img` tag:



```html

Last week, in the Konyaspor - Eyüpsor match, Kramer and Umut Nayir received yellow cards and could not play in the Beşiktaş match, putting them in a suspended situation. This referee friend did not see any fault here.



Bahattin Duran: If there is no disciplinary action here, it should not be applied in any match. The fourth referee is clearly following. If there is no card in this chaos.



Bülent Yıldırım: This place cannot be passed without reaction or penalty.



Is the red card correct? Former referees united in a single opinion on the decision that marked the match


REFEREE CIHAN AYDIN'S REPORT CARD



Deniz Çoban: He missed 5 yellow cards and gave 2 yellow cards incorrectly. 7 disciplinary errors. We said Marius could be a second yellow with Bahattin Hocayla. He failed.



Bülent Yıldırım: This match should be analyzed from start to finish.



Bahattin Duran: One of the worst performances of Cihan Aydın that I have ever watched.



```



Let me know if you need any further assistance!

In order to provide you with a better service, we position cookies on our site. Your personal data is collected and processed within the scope of KVKK and GDPR. For detailed information, you can review our Data Policy / Disclosure Text. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.', '