Is a red card needed? The famous referee has settled the controversial incidents.

Is a red card needed? The famous referee has settled the controversial incidents.

01.11.2026 23:40

Former referee Bülent Yıldırım, commenting on the beIN Trio program, evaluated the controversial positions in the Kasımpaşa - Beşiktaş match that ended in a 2-2 draw. Here are the details...

In the 10th week of the Trendyol Süper Lig, Beşiktaş drew 2-2 with Kasımpala in a match in which they had taken a 2-0 lead. Former referee Bülent Yıldırım evaluated the controversial positions on the Trio program on beIN SPORTS.

SHOULD AGBADOU HAVE BEEN SHOWN A RED CARD?

Bülent Yıldırım: "This position is a clear goal-scoring opportunity. The distance to the goal is very close, Hajradinovic is closer to the goal, the chance of control is high, there is no chance of controlling the ball, and there is no other defender. Nübel is late to the position. All the criteria for a clear goal-scoring opportunity are met. A clear red card, VAR should have intervened. There is a very clear mistake."

THE POSITION BETWEEN AYBERK AND MURILLO

Bülent Yıldırım: "Murillo got angry at Ayberk. After the natural action ended, he makes an extra movement with his left foot to Ayberk's groin area. A violent action that went unnoticed. Murillo should have seen a red card."

THE CHALLENGE BETWEEN ARAOUS AND VLAHOVIC

Bülent Yıldırım: "The referee showed a yellow card. This action is a violent action. Is this football? No. Adem Atous should have been shown a red card. It was missed by the referee and VAR."

In order to provide you with a better service, we position cookies on our site. Your personal data is collected and processed within the scope of KVKK and GDPR. For detailed information, you can review our Data Policy / Disclosure Text. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.', '