The judicial package did not satisfy Ahmet Türk either: It caused disappointment, and our concerns have grown.

02.06.2025 10:10

The 10th Judicial Package, which was approved by the Justice Commission of the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), has been criticized for its narrow scope. Ahmet Türk from the DEM Party stated that the package does not meet expectations, saying, "It has been disappointing, and our concerns have grown." Türk expressed hope that a new process would begin in October.

Sure! Here is the translated HTML content with the text and the `title` and `alt` attributes of any `img` tags translated as well:



```html

The bill known as the "10th Judicial Package," which has been the subject of public debate for months, regarding the Execution of Sentences and Security Measures, was accepted by the Justice Commission of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM). However, the content of the proposal has been criticized for not meeting expectations.

NO CONSENSUS AMONG THREE PARTIES

During the preparation process of the bill, no consensus was reached among the AK Party, MHP, and DEM Party, particularly regarding the reduction of sentences and penal regulations concerning "organized crimes." Therefore, the scope of the execution regulation was kept quite narrow. The regulation includes only limited changes in specific areas.

AHMET TÜRK: OUR CONCERNS HAVE GROWN

One of the most striking statements regarding the new regulation came from Ahmet Türk, a prominent figure in the DEM Party and a member of the Imralı Delegation. Türk expressed that the regulation created a "disappointment," stating: "There are criticisms, and even a lack of trust. There are concerns that these are not sincere. In fact, we have seen this sincerity. But it must be said clearly that our concerns have grown, especially because a process that would respond to expectations has not started recently, particularly before the holiday."

"WE HOPE A NEW PROCESS WILL BEGIN IN OCTOBER"

Ahmet Türk indicated that the current regulation in the execution law is far from expectations, stating, "The execution law they have presented today is at a point that does not respond to our expectations. This has created disappointment for us. We hope that in October, it will be possible to start a new process that will respond to our expectations."

DEBATES CONTINUE

The Judicial Package continues to be a topic of debate regarding the scope of the changes it includes and the target audience it aims for. As criticisms from various groups regarding the execution regulations related to political and organized crimes rise, it is eagerly awaited how the bill will shape during the General Assembly stage.