What happens if the PKK does not respond to Öcalan's call? Answer from Hüseyin Yayman to the question everyone is curious about.

```html

After the calls made by MHP General Chairman Devlet Bahçeli, a meeting traffic began between the DEM Party delegation and the terrorist organization PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan. While the process is closely monitored by the public, AK Party Hatay Deputy and Chairman of the TBMM Digital Media Commission Hüseyin Yayman made striking evaluations regarding the issue during the program he attended.

"IF PKK DOES NOT ACCEPT ÖCALAN'S CALL..."

In a previous statement, Yayman said, "I think that in February, there will be an environment in Turkey where weapons will be laid down, and the issue of PKK no longer carrying out actions in Turkey will come to the agenda." In response to the question, "What will happen if PKK says we do not accept Öcalan's call?" he replied, "The President and Bahçeli will say, we said to lay down arms, you did not accept. What more can we do? They will gain political superiority by saying that. The DEM Party, which is in the position of PKK's party, will appear to be using Öcalan as a front. Why am I analyzing the process with a cause-and-effect relationship? PKK must lay down its arms; there is no Kurdish issue, there is a terrorism issue. Here, it needs to be understood that there are so-called terrorist leaders of PKK, there are barons, and there is no world where they go to the mountains; there is a terrorist organization that is disconnected from this reality. If they say we will continue to fight, Turkey is a great state, and necessary actions will be taken," he answered.

Here are the highlights from Yayman's statements;

"I think positively; there will be some problems in this process. I believe that at the end of the process, Turkey will take on a completely different climate, and the terrorist organization will lay down its arms. As someone who knows Diyarbakır and Doğu Beyazıt since the 90s, I can say that there are problems. The Ottoman Empire could not solve these issues, which is why the nationalism demand that started with the French Revolution affects empires. The First World War breaks out, and after the war, we lose Arabia and the Middle East, then the Sheikh Said rebellion occurs. As someone who works on this issue, there are two different politics here. There is no word left unsaid on this issue. There is the SHP's Kurdish report. There is thoughtless politics in Turkey. Engin Alan is a valuable commander; he should go and see what has been said in history. Turkey spends 10 billion dollars on fighting PKK.

"THERE IS NO REASON FOR THEM TO STAY IN THE MOUNTAINS"

Our President said, if there is a problem, I will solve it. It seems strange to speak without knowledge. Today, there is no problem called the Kurdish issue. There are radio and TV channels broadcasting in Kurdish. People were imprisoned for the establishment of this channel. There were DGM's in Turkey; everyone was tried, and these were abolished by the AK Party. There was a State of Emergency Governorship. The concept of OHAL was abolished by the AK Party. Those who said a Kurdish Institute should be established, like Ahmet Türk, were expelled. People could not speak in their own languages with their children in prison. It was forbidden to publish newspapers and magazines; now Kurdish propaganda is being made. There is no reason for PKK to stay in the mountains. If PKK really has a demand for democracy and freedom, these are already provided.

"NOTHING WILL HAPPEN WITHOUT TURKEY'S CONSENT"

International structures, intelligence organizations like CIA and MOSSAD told the terrorists in Qandil, what agreement are you making with the Turks? They said we will give you small states in Syria. In 2013, the terrorist organization that wanted to gain a small state in Syria overturned the table. What is the situation of PKK in Syria now? They left Tel Rifat, they left Manbij, Kamışlı, Deyrzor, and they will leave. Nothing will happen in this region without Turkey's consent.

"TURKEY WILL BE FREE FROM A GREAT PROBLEM"

Öcalan, the head of PKK, will tell his organization to lay down their arms. There are two scenarios here. Bahçeli's call was met with Öcalan saying, lay down your arms. What will happen, who will have the word? In the terrorist organization, they said we are laying down our arms. Why would they lay them down, what reason is there for them to stay in the mountains? All the problems that PKK had when they went to the mountains have been resolved. If they say I laid down my arms, what will happen? Turkey will be free from a great problem. We consider this issue as Turkey's democratization issue. The issue of education in the mother tongue remains. In this matter, Turkey says, I can discuss this, but you must lay down your arms.

"WITH DRONES, UAVs, AND SİHAs, PKK HAS REACHED THE END OF THE ROAD"

Turkey's resolute stance was important. The soldiers have their views. Fikret Bila wrote a book. There are statements from Doğan Güreş. There are books by Mehmet Ali Kışlalı. The fight against terrorism in Turkey has always been conducted with a problem. The TSK could not grasp the issue; there was no need for tools. The first combat helicopter came to Turkey in 1992. Combat helicopters arrived in 1992. Doğan Güreş said we did not have armored vehicles; we brought weapons from East Germany, and we learned asymmetric warfare. This technology has now reached such a point that with drones, UAVs, and SİHAs, PKK has reached the end of the road.

In 2013, a strategy was determined by discussing it in Turkey's National Security Council. When PKK opened ditches in the cities, the state did not say open ditches; it buried them in the ditches. We will understand whether PKK has a demand for rights or a demand to divide Turkey, or if it is a subcontractor of international organizations from this process onwards. The period when PKK was established in 1978 is different from now; the world has changed. All the demands expressed by DEM Party, which is the party of PKK, have been fulfilled by our President. Except for the issue of education in the mother tongue, this can be discussed. We have seen what the US did in Afghanistan and Iraq. They secretly provided them with weapons. New terrorist organizations produced under laboratory conditions emerged, including ISIS.