Famous commentators agreed on the same opinion: Was there a foul on İrfan Can Kahveci before Samsunspor's goal?

21.10.2024 08:50

The Trio team analyzed the controversial moments of the Samsunspor-Fenerbahçe match. Former referees did not consider the intervention on İrfan Can Kahveci before Samsunspor's goal as a foul.

Last night, the controversial positions of the Samsunspor-Fenerbahçe match, which ended in a 2-2 draw, were commented on by the broadcasting organization.

IS THERE A FOUL ON İRFAN CAN?

Former referees agreed that the intervention on İrfan Can Kahveci before Samsunspor's goal, which was the most debated position of the night, was not a foul.

Here are the referees' comments;

Deniz Çoban; There is neither a foul nor a handball! The goal is clean. Our referee called fouls for such simple contacts that, looking at that standard, he could have called this one too. Looking at the foul and yellow card he called on Kostic in the 8th minute... Neither was a foul. This goal is clean. No one should look for anything.

Bülent Yıldırım; The Samsunspor player gained an advantage and after getting behind İrfan Can, he wanted to benefit from that small charge. I don't see any violation here. There is no foul.

Bahattin Duran; There is an intervention by the Samsunspor player on İrfan Can with his hand, but for me, this intervention is not a violation; the decision to continue is correct.