Is Dzeko's position a penalty or not? All the famous commentators agreed on the same opinion.

```html

The beIN Trio team evaluated the controversial positions in the Antalyaspor-Fenerbahçe match, which took place last night and was full of excitement.

WAS THE MOVE ON DZEKO A PENALTY?

All commentators agreed on the position in the 6th minute where Edin Dzeko fell and expected a penalty.

Here are those comments;

Deniz Çoban: The referee decided on a handball. Veysel clearly and obviously makes contact with Dzeko's leg, disrupting his supporting leg. It's a very clear penalty. A provable violation. A penalty should have been given, VAR should have intervened, and Veysel should have received a yellow card.

Bahattin Duran: The move made by Veysel is a very clear penalty. Veysel has one hand on Dzeko's back, and there is contact with his hip. A penalty can be considered because of this. Veysel clearly strikes Dzeko's left ankle with his right foot. This strike has a very clear effect on Dzeko, and he falls due to the foot strike. A penalty due to the foot strike. This can be proven; this is very clear evidence. There should be VAR intervention. A penalty should be given with VAR intervention, but the referee should see it first. The referee bent down to watch. If the referee doesn't see it, there is very clear evidence; if I were VAR, I would invite the referee to watch for the penalty with this evidence.

Bülent Yıldırım: The attacking player did not place his foot there and make contact. The defensive player's move is what should be looked at. Dzeko has the right to position himself as he wishes. Veysel's move from below hits the cleat and the ankle. We saw that; there is nothing to discuss. A clear penalty. In my personal opinion, the referee thought this was a normal duel while evaluating the charge above. A very clear foot intervention, a very clear penalty, a very clear VAR intervention would have been more appropriate.

Here is that position;