Is it a penalty or not? Everyone agreed on Osayi's situation.

```html

The BeIN Trio team evaluated the controversial positions after Fenerbahçe's 3-1 victory against Gaziantep FK.

"Does Osayi-Samuel play the ball in the penalty area, should there be a penalty decision?"

Bahattin Duran: "If the ball touches the hand or arm, we will say it's a penalty within the field lines. It is necessary to prove whether the ball touched the hand or not. From this perspective, it seems to touch the hand. From another angle, it does not seem to touch the hand."

"I RESPECT THE VAR'S DECISION"

Bülent Yıldırım: "Even if it bounces, since the left arm is raised and unnatural, if there is contact, we will say it's a penalty. If there is a violation, it should be seen from the goal line camera inside the field. When we scan the angles, one seems to have a possibility of play, while in another I cannot prove it. I respect the VAR's decision."

"THE IDEA OF IT TOUCHING THE HAND DOES NOT FORM"

Deniz Çoban: "From one angle, the idea of it touching the hand does not form for me. The VAR referee must have watched this from 4 angles. While it may seem like contact in one place, it may look different in another. If I am not mistaken, there was a highly debated handball position in a Trabzonspor - Konyaspor match, and the public consensus was in favor of handball. They showed me, the VAR screen divided into 4, there are 2 angles shown as the clearest touch to the hand, in another angle there is a 1 hand's width gap between the ball and the arm."

"NO PENALTY SHOULD BE GIVEN"

Does İsmail Yüksek's intervention on his opponent in the penalty area require a penalty?

Deniz Çoban: "İsmail stepped and it was over, if he stepped... The ball was not in play."

Bülent Yıldırım: "If it was a careless contact, uncontrolled contact, we could talk about a yellow card. Since the ball is not in play, there is no penalty. We cannot call it a penalty when the ball is out of play."

Bahattin Duran: "İsmail Yüksek stepped on the foot, but the ball is not in play. We cannot talk about a penalty from a technical foul."

"HOW DOES VAR NOT SEE THIS"

Is the continuation decision correct in Becao's intervention on Arda in the 29th minute?

Bülent Yıldırım: "Arda's shirt completely came off in the struggle. While Arda was trying to wear his shirt, he also tripped him. Becao committed two penalties, both were missed. He held and pulled the opponent's shirt, and while the ball was in play, he also tripped him. How does VAR not see this."

"A CLEAR PENALTY"

Deniz Çoban: "First, there was a mutual struggle. Then Arda's shirt went up. The continuation decision is wrong, a penalty is required."

Bahattin Duran: "First, both held each other. Then Becao persistently pulled and held the shirt. By making an unsporting move while trying to wear the shirt, Becao brought down his opponent. A clear penalty."

"THE THIRD GOAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED"

Is there a foul before Fenerbahçe's third goal?

Bülent Yıldırım: "Mert Müldür commits a foul. He steps on the opponent's foot. The goal should have been disallowed."

Bahattin Duran: "There is a foul."

Deniz Çoban: "The position is a foul."