03.03.2025 07:50
The beIN Trio team evaluated the decisions of referee Mehmet Türkmen after the Fenerbahçe-Antalyaspor match. The decision to play on in the situation where Fenerbahçe was expecting a penalty was deemed correct. Answers were provided regarding Soner's intervention on Dzeko, Szymanski's intervention on his opponent, and whether there was a foul before Fenerbahçe's third goal.
```html
The beIn Trio team commented on referee Mehmet Türkmen's decisions after the Fenerbahçe-Antalyaspor match.
Was the decision to play on correct in the situation where Fenerbahçe expected a penalty?
Bülent Yıldırım: No penalty. The ball hits the shoulder area.
Bahattin Duran: No foul, the decision to continue is correct.
Deniz Çoban: The decision to continue is correct.
Was the decision to continue correct in Soner's intervention on Dzeko?
Bahattin Duran: The ball remained with Fenerbahçe, he played advantage. It would have been more correct if he had blown the whistle when the game stopped.
Bülent Yıldırım: Careless intervention. No need for a yellow card, but it is a foul.
Was the advantage decision correct in Szymanski's intervention on his opponent?
Bülent Yıldırım: There is a foul on the ankle area. A yellow card should have been given here.
Bahattin Duran: A borderline action. I would accept it if a yellow card was given. I can't say it's a very clear yellow card.
Deniz Çoban: It's a very clear yellow card.
Is there a foul before Fenerbahçe's 3rd goal?
Bahattin Duran: I think there should be a decision made on the field. This position is a foul on the field. It is in the initial phase of the attack. This is not a position where VAR can intervene. There is a careless action from Çağlar, he disrupted Soner. It is a foul on the field. It is also correct that there was no VAR intervention.
Bülent Yıldırım: The position is Mehmet Türkmen's problem. This is not a position where VAR can intervene. Çağlar's intervention with his right knee on Soner's right knee, along with the small push he made from above, constituted an effective foul, preventing Soner from reaching the ball. A foul should have been given by the referee on the field.
Deniz Çoban: I agree. After the ball has gone, there is a small contact with Soner's right knee when he has no chance to play the ball. I would find it more correct if the referee had blown the whistle on the field.
Should a yellow card have been given for Dzeko's foul on Thalisson?
Bülent Yıldırım: Feet are high, he swept his opponent. Dzeko should have received a yellow card.
Bahattin Duran: There is no escaping from this position, it is a yellow card. A reckless foul. There is no minute for this, no advantage. A clear yellow card. Advantage is nice, but Dzeko should have received a yellow card at the end of the advantage.
Deniz Çoban: If you say advantage, you see how Dzeko came, this is a yellow card. It's that clear.
In Soner's intervention, Fred fell to the ground, should a card have been required?
Bülent Yıldırım: Soner prepared his elbow and hit in a reckless manner. It was a clear unsporting behavior, a yellow card should have been given.
Bahattin Duran: How can a player stop like this in the natural flow of the position? He prepared his elbow and made a reckless move to the throat area. A clear yellow card.
Deniz Çoban: I think it should also be a yellow card.
Should Safuri have received a card?
Bülent Yıldırım: He should have received a card. He clearly stepped on Szymanski's ankle with the sole of his cleat. He stepped on it in a way that could twist the ankle.
Bahattin Duran: It should have been a yellow card.
Deniz Çoban: It should have been a yellow card.
Was the decision to continue correct in the position where Cenk Tosun expected a penalty?
Bahattin Duran: The decision to continue is correct.
Bülent Yıldırım: The decision to continue is correct.
Deniz Çoban: The decision to continue is correct.
```