02.09.2026 01:40
The polemic between Ferhat Göçer and Sinan Akçıl, who were close friends for a period, grew with a new crisis that started over songs. After Göçer's harsh words, Akçıl announced this time that he sent a formal notice through a notary for his own works performed by his former friend.
The tension between Ferhat Göçer and Sinan Akçıl, who were once close friends, has taken on a new dimension. Days after Göçer's harsh words towards Akçıl, Akçıl broke his silence and announced that he had initiated a legal process to prevent his works from being performed live. It was noteworthy that in Akçıl's post, he did not explicitly use Göçer's name but only included his initials.
HARSH WORDS FROM GÖÇER TO AKÇIL
The background of the coldness between the duo came to the agenda with the statements Göçer made on the Number1 Star program hosted by Kadir Çetin.
When asked why their relationship was no longer as it used to be, Göçer criticized Akçıl for standing out with the magazine agenda rather than music. Göçer argued that his former friend was "playing the media monkey" and said he should return to music and focus on producing songs again.
Göçer also stated that he did not expect their relationship to improve as long as Akçıl continued this attitude.
NOTEWORTHY MOVE FROM AKÇIL DAYS LATER
While the tension between the parties continued after these statements, a noteworthy move came from Akçıl.
Akçıl announced that within the scope of the legal process initiated by his lawyer Eda Salman, a notarized warning letter was sent to the singer he referred to as "F.G."
Akçıl stated that in the warning letter, it was officially notified that he no longer consents to his works being performed live. He also announced that if the songs are performed live despite the warning, necessary legal action would be taken.
HE DID NOT WRITE GÖÇER'S NAME
The striking detail in Akçıl's post was that the name of the person to whom the warning letter was sent was not explicitly written. The singer used the phrase "a singer named F.G." and only included initials.
However, due to the recent polemic and Göçer's statements towards Akçıl, it was assessed that these expressions were directed at Ferhat Göçer.
After this move by Akçıl, attention turned back to Ferhat Göçer. It became a matter of curiosity how Göçer would respond to the warning letter and Akçıl's latest move.