24.05.2025 16:35
Following the selection of Şükriye Aci as a plaintiff in the case, new footage has been released regarding the traffic accident that led to the death of Oğuz Murat Aci. The footage, taken immediately after the accident, shows the vehicles involved in the crash and the injured individuals lying on the ground. Five people were injured in the accident, and Timur Cihantimur, who was involved in the crash, along with his mother Eylem Tok, has fled abroad.
```html
29-year-old Oğuz Murat Aci, who pulled his malfunctioning ATV to the emergency lane after an accident that occurred last year in Kemerburgaz, Eyüpsultan, lost his life after being hit by a car driven by 17-year-old Timur Cihantimur, the son of Op. Dr. Bülent Cihantimur and writer Eylem Tok. Five other people were also injured in the accident.
NEW FOOTAGE REVEALS THE MAGNITUDE OF THE ACCIDENT
New footage of the accident that occurred in Eyüpsultan in March 2024 has emerged. The images taken immediately after the accident show the vehicles involved and the injured lying on the ground.
HIS WIFE HAD WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT
It was revealed that Timur Cihantimur and his mother Eylem Tok fled abroad after the accident. In the long-standing case, Oğuz Murat Aci's wife, Şükriye Aci, had withdrawn her complaint against four suspects, including Timur Cihantimur's mother Eylem Tok and father Bülent Cihantimur, who fled to the USA.
THE WIFE'S WITHDRAWAL OF THE COMPLAINT CAUSED A CRISIS IN THE FAMILY
Oğuz Murat Aci's father, Özer Aci, reacted to his daughter-in-law Şükriye Aci, who withdrew her complaint against the four suspects.
Özer Aci stated that he had suspected for a while that Şükriye Aci would withdraw her complaint, adding that his daughter-in-law had started to stay with her parents after the accident.
Aci also mentioned that he suspected his daughter-in-law would receive money, saying, "What is wrong in my opinion may be right in hers, but it is wrong because she did it secretly. As the grandfather of that grandchild, I had the right to know, 'How much did she receive, what did she do, was it little or a lot?' I have been fighting all this time."
Aci expressed that he has created public opinion and stated:
"I am getting tired. I am the one who lost a child after 30 years. Şükriye Aci, who lost her husband after 3 years, sold my son's blood for a price. She has given up her material and spiritual rights. How will she explain the spirituality to that child tomorrow? Won't that child ask questions?"
Aci recalled that when he was about to meet Bülent Cihantimur, he asked his daughter-in-law, "They are offering money, what is your thought?" and that she replied, "It is not them who provide sustenance, it is Allah." He argued that Şükriye Aci was deceived by her lawyers.
Özer Aci explained that the family did not make any offer to him, and when asked what he wanted, he told Bülent Cihantimur to bring his child and ex-wife from America and hand them over to justice, saying, "Until today, he could not say, 'I could not fulfill your request. As a grieving father, I empathize and share your sorrow.' He is trying to solve it with money."
Aci emphasized his belief that divine justice will eventually prevail, stating, "I have never given up on my case and I will not. If they offered me Istanbul, what would I say? Will my son come back from the grave?"
Regarding the ongoing case, Aci said:
"Within the framework of the laws, my son's inheritance rights belong to his wife and child. My struggle is for that 1.5-year-old child. 'You say Pars, what will happen to me?' he says. I told Şükriye Hanım; 'You will automatically benefit from Pars's opportunities, bread, and water because you are his mother.' But what did she do? She was too lazy to offer me a cup of tea or water. She preferred to take money. May her path be open."
"MY FATHER-IN-LAW ENTERED INTO A MONEY BARGAIN WITHOUT INFORMING US"
Şükriye Aci responded to her father-in-law's accusations, saying, "Until 6 months after my husband's death, I was not aware of any information regarding the legal process. Because my father-in-law was managing the entire process and no information was given to me. And after 6 months, I learned that meetings were held with the other party without our knowledge and that a money bargain was made, and after realizing that they would take it without my permission, I started looking for a new lawyer."
Continuing her statement, the daughter-in-law said, "The slander they threw at me, the hundreds of millions were actually their demands. Because they demanded it, when I agreed, they thought I had agreed to such an amount. Fortunately, I am not as greedy as they are. I never entered into such a money bargain. A protocol was made only through my lawyers; I didn't even meet face to face. They are currently trying to put their actions on me."
```