Father was killed like this in front of his 3-year-old son.

Fatih S., who demanded extortion from Fatih Oral, who operates a gym in the Dikmen neighborhood of Çankaya in Ankara, threatened Oral and shot up his shop when he did not receive the demanded extortion. Most recently, on June 12, Fatih S. entered the gym wearing a motorcycle helmet to avoid being recognized and opened fire on Oral, who was with his 3-year-old son.

MURDER MOMENT CAPTURED ON CAMERA

Despite all the interventions, Oral, who was seriously injured, could not be saved, while Fatih S., who fled after the attack, was quickly caught and taken into custody. After his procedures at the police station, the suspect was referred to the courthouse and was arrested by the court and sent to prison. It was learned that Fatih S. stated in his testimony at the court that he came to the gym to talk and that he fired in response to the attack against him. The footage of the murder incident has emerged.

FOOTAGE IN THE CASE FILE

The lawyer of the case, Sait Bingöl, who spoke about the incident, stated that the attacker's claims do not reflect the truth and said: "The person who murdered Fatih Oral stated in his last court testimony that he went to the scene to talk and fired in response to the attack against him. However, as can be understood from the footage submitted to the case, the attacker did not go to the scene to meet in any way, nor was there any financial relationship with the person he killed. It is clear that what has been narrated is not true, and as reflected in the case file, the attacker went to the scene with the intent to kill.

"HE WAS ATTACKED DESPITE HAVING HIS CHILD WITH HIM"

The murdered person was attacked despite having his 3-year-old child with him. There is no aspect of what the defendant did that can be approved in any way. We stated this in court. Together with the footage in the files, it is evident that this is a brutal murder, and considering the manner of killing, it is clear that the defendant fired without any hesitation, and given the number of shots, this is absolutely unforgivable. It is evident that the defendant expressed himself in this way to benefit from the provisions of severe provocation. For this reason, we are following the case. We will continue our legal struggle to ensure that the attacker receives the heaviest penalty."