18.09.2025 09:50
The beIN Trio team, evaluating the Fenerbahçe-Alanyaspor match, criticized referee Cihan Aydın's crucial decisions. The commentators argued that the Oosterwolde incident in the 90+6 minute and the situation where a handball was expected were both "clear penalties."
```html
The beIn Trio team commented on referee Cihan Aydın's decisions after the Fenerbahçe - Alanyaspor match. Analyzing the positions one by one after the match, the Trio commentators discussed the moment Oosterwolde fell in the penalty area and the expectations of Fenerbahçe players regarding handball.
"CLEAR PENALTY" EMPHASIS Famous commentators stated that both positions were penalties, saying, "VAR definitely needed to intervene."
Was the continuation decision correct in the position where Oosterwolde fell in the 90+6th minute?
Image: beIN SPORTS Bülent Yıldırım: Hadergjonaj is wrestling foul on Oosterwolde without going for the ball. This is a very clear penalty. Clear, a foul made in an area without the ball. The ball is in play, it is a penalty that requires VAR intervention.
Bahattin Duran: There is no need to talk in detail. Hadergjonaj's clear violation. He has no relation to the ball, he grabbed his opponent with both hands. He almost brought him into the goal. The response is a penalty. A penalty should be given with VAR intervention. The referee must first give the penalty.
Deniz Çoban: A position that cannot be explained. Hadergjonaj pushed Oosterwolde to the ground in a way that restricted all his movements. Oosterwolde has no movement towards Hadergjonaj. He came from behind, grabbed him without looking at the ball, and brought him down without any relation to the ball. In the cleanest terms, in the simplest terms, it is careless behavior. He brought him down and threw him out of the game.
Commentators answering the question, "Was the continuation decision correct in the position where Fenerbahçe expected a handball in the 90+6th minute?":
Image: beIN SPORTS Bülent Yıldırım: Güven Yalçın was careless, he came by widening himself. The proximity of the distance is not important. He widened the area. A clear, obvious penalty. A second penalty in close seconds. A proven penalty that requires VAR intervention.
Bahattin Duran: A very clear penalty. A penalty both on the field and in the VAR room. Güven came here with his hands open. He swept and carried the ball with his open hand. He made every possible movement to be a violation. If Güven had played the ball with his foot knowingly, he would not have been penalized. Cenk, who played with the ball, hit Güven's foot, which does not mean he played it knowingly. The risk Güven took, the risk of his hands was a penalty that needed to be penalized. It should have been penalized on the field, if not in VAR. Both are clear penalties.
Deniz Çoban: There are two clear penalties. Both the first and the second are clear. Both require VAR intervention. Did he miss the other one while checking one?
THE DEBATE IS GROWING After this commentary from the Trio team, referee decisions once again became a topic on social media and sparked a major debate among football fans.
```