Kılıçdaroğlu's tough moments! He said, "This is not true," but changed his mind when the signed document was published.

The former leader of the CHP, Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, who has recently made a name for himself with his achievements, answered Kübra Par's questions on TV100 screens. One of the questions directed to Kılıçdaroğlu in the program was whether he had made a protocol with Ümit Özdağ, the leader of the Zafer Party, in the presidential elections.

HE DENIED THE ALLEGATIONS: THERE IS NO SUCH THING

Kılıçdaroğlu answered the question "Was there a secret protocol signed between you and Ümit Özdağ? Was the Ministry of Interior and MIT given to the Zafer Party?" with "No, two protocols were made. One was shared with the public, and the other was shared later. There is no such thing. Go online, find the protocol, and see if there is such a statement or not."

KILIÇDAROĞLU CORNERED

After Kılıçdaroğlu's words, Kübra Par intervened and cornered Kılıçdaroğlu by saying, "A text claimed to have your signature came from the deputy leaders of various political parties." After this question, Ümit Özdağ also shared the protocol in question on his social media account.

Kübra Par listed the articles in the secret protocol;

• A total of 3 ministries, including the Ministry of Interior and 2 other ministries.
• Ministries of security, justice, and economy, as well as deputy ministerial positions and undersecretariats agreed upon, will be allocated to the Zafer Party.
• Joint decisions will be made with the Zafer Party leader Ümit Özdağ regarding the appointments of the positions allocated to the Zafer Party and its affiliates.
• The organizational structures and assignment principles of the ministries assigned by the Zafer Party will continue without any changes, just like before the May 14, 2023 elections.

CHANGED HIS MIND

Kılıçdaroğlu from the CHP replied, "If it is accepted at the 6-party table, okay. I would like to draw your attention, this is not a text signed on behalf of the 6-party table. If it is accepted at the 6-party table, this text would have been valid. Also, there is no MIT there."