NATO leader Rutte has come to persuade Turkey.

Here is the translated HTML content with the text and the `title` and `alt` attributes of the `img` tag translated into English:



```html

President Erdoğan received NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte yesterday evening. The closed-door meeting at the Presidential Complex lasted approximately 1 hour. Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and National Defense Minister Yaşar Güler were also present at the meeting.

THE COMMUNICATION DIRECTORATE SHARED THE DETAILS OF THE MEETING

According to a statement from the Presidential Communication Directorate, during President Erdoğan's meeting with Rutte, the possible actions to end the Ukraine-Russia War and the massacre in Palestine, the joint steps to be taken in the fight against terrorism, Turkey's hosting of the NATO Summit in 2026, the solidarity of NATO allies in supplying defense industry materials to Turkey, and Turkey's contributions to NATO as an ally were evaluated.

ATTEMPT TO PERSUADE ANKARA

While Erdoğan's meeting with Rutte resonated widely in the public, experts evaluating the summit, which was a first in Ankara, interpreted the visit as an attempt to persuade Ankara due to the growing global war threat and the changing dynamics.

"SERIOUS PROBLEMS WITH NATO"

Officials point out that there are serious problems with NATO, particularly regarding the definition of terrorism, support for organizations such as PKK-PYD-YPG, and the stance against Israeli occupation and massacres. International Relations Expert Assoc. Prof. Dr. Furkan Kaya highlighted Rutte's meeting with Biden and Trump, stating, "With the increasing threat of war and nuclear weapons, Turkey's role as a mediator and key country has gained importance.

Trump promised that the Ukraine war would end, but he has no options. For this reason, Turkey is critically important," he said. According to reports in the Türkiye newspaper, another expert on the subject, Deniz Tansi, stated, "We don't even have a common definition of terrorism with NATO. The actions regarding the PKK and its extensions are evident. However, on the other hand, a NATO without Turkey poses a much greater threat. Including South Cyprus and Israel in a pact without us could happen within hours. However, due to the increasing tension, they need Turkey more than ever."