The investigation into the murder of 8-year-old Narin Güran in Diyarbakır continues. In the investigation, 8 suspects, including the mother, brother, and uncle, were arrested, while 4 people were released under judicial control. The latest developments in the Narin Güran murder case point to the brother as the main suspect. During the examination of the suspects' phones by the gendarmerie teams, it was determined that there was no phone or messaging communication between the mother Yüksel Güran and the uncle Salim Güran. It was also found that Salim Güran, who was identified as the only suspect who deleted phone records and messages, had made numerous calls with his great uncle during and after the incident. WAS THE BODY DISPOSED OF BY FAMILY DECISION?In addition to the deleted voice recordings and messages, the gendarmerie teams also reached the phone conversations made by Salim Güran's worker Mehmet Selim Atasoy and his son Ramazan Atasoy, which took place during and after the time when Narin went missing. Based on the evidence and documents obtained so far, it is being investigated whether the brother Enes is the main suspect in the murder and whether the family decided to dispose of the body through a subcontractor. MOTHER INITIALLY CALLED THE GREAT UNCLEAccording to the available data and information, the first person called by the mother Yüksel Güran when Narin went missing was the great uncle, who later stated in his statement that Nevzat Bahtiyar, a member of the Bahtiyar family known as the criminal family of the village, brought and disposed of Narin's body in the river. The statement of the great uncle is expected to be taken while it is being investigated that the little girl's body was handed over to Nevzat Bahtiyar for disposal according to the family council decision after being killed by her brother. BITE MARKS ON THE ARM INCREASE SUSPICIONSAccording to a report in Milliyet, the Forensic Medicine Institute officials state that the skin and tissue fragments that will come out from under Narin's nails and the second bite mark on the brother Enes' arm, which was left after the comment "human bite suitable for a small mouth structure" before the discovery of Narin's body, will be crucial in determining the killer. Although there is no other human DNA on it, stating that it cannot be clearly said that the little girl was not subjected to abuse or an attempted abuse from her deteriorating body. STATEMENT FULL OF CONTRADICTIONSThe brother Enes Güran stated that he learned about his sister's disappearance from his mother's words "Narin didn't come for dinner" at 19:11. In his statement regarding the bruises on his eyes, the brother Güran said the following: "When we were looking for Narin, corn cobs were hitting us everywhere. Then we received news from the hospital that there was a child, we went and saw that it wasn't Narin. After we returned, I punched myself out of grief. Then when I was taken to the forensic medicine, I noticed that there were also small scratches, and I realized that they could be from the corn cobs." "I WENT TO THE STORE" HE SAID, TURNED OUT TO BE A LIEIn his statement to the prosecutor, Enes Güran's statement was read, and he was asked about the statement given by the village grocer Ömer Susanbağ. In response, Enes Güran said, "I went to Sofi Market and bought an energy drink for myself. At the time of my purchase, our mentally disabled villager Süleyman also came to the store. I bought an energy drink for Süleyman as well and left the store. After leaving the store, I saw my friend Muhammet Yağmur. We talked. Then Kerem Güran, my brother Muhammet, and Tahir Kaya came to us. After a while, our step-grandmother Süheyla Güran came to us. She asked us to help move her hay, but my brother and the others refused, saying they were tired." However, it was learned that Enes Güran never went to the Sofi Market he mentioned.
|