17.12.2024 08:50
The beIN Trio team evaluated the controversial positions following the match in which Galatasaray defeated Trabzonspor 4-3. The commentators also discussed Trabzonspor's second goal scored by Ozan Tufan. Here are those comments...
```html
The BeIN Trio team evaluated the controversial positions after Galatasaray defeated Trabzonspor 4-3 with a last-minute goal.
"IT CAN'T BE 100% SURE"
Did the ball go out in Trabzonspor's second goal with Ozan Tufan?
Deniz Çoban: "Goal line technology cannot solve this; it can only evaluate the area between the goalposts. It cannot measure the out line. This is an urban legend. To be 100% sure whether the ball crossed the line or not, you need to look only from the camera aligned with the goalpost. Everything else can be misleading. In goal line technology, we say 'aaa goal', but it may not have crossed by centimeters. There is a feeling that it may have crossed the line, but we cannot be 100% certain. This position, with all its sins and merits, is in the conscience of the assistant referee. The assistant referee is watching this position from a very correct angle."
"The last person to be debated in this position is VAR. Why? For VAR to intervene in this and similar positions, it must be very clear that the ball has gone out by 15-20 cm, and it can intervene in that position. VAR cannot intervene in this position. In a position where you would say the ball has gone out, the projection of the ball may have touched the line even by 1 millimeter. No matter whom you ask in the world, they will say VAR cannot intervene, and that’s how it ends. There is nothing we can do other than trusting the assistant referee."
"LOOKS LIKE IT'S OUT FROM ONE ANGLE, BUT NOT FROM ANOTHER"
Bahattin Duran: "It looks like the ball has not gone out. If the projection of the ball even touches the line by 1 millimeter, the ball is considered in play. The ball must make contact with the line. The projection of the ball not touching the line by even 1 millimeter means it has not gone out. The result is, yes, from one angle, the ball looks like it has clearly gone out. From a few angles, it looks like it has not gone out."
"THIS BALL HAS NOT GONE OUT"
Bülent Yıldırım: "In the VAR system, if you cannot prove the opposite of the decision made by the match official, the decision of the field official is definitive. VAR cannot make such a determination. The impression is high that it has gone out from one angle, and the impression is high that it has not gone out from three angles. VAR cannot intervene. Based on my experience, this ball has not gone out."
DIAMETER OF THE BALL
Bahattin Duran: "The circumference of the ball is 2pr, which gives a radius of 10.82, making it 22 cm for a large r."
"WE NEED TO SEE 11 CENTIMETERS OF GRASS"
Deniz Çoban: We need to see 11 centimeters of grass for it to be considered fully out.
```