The case of 'Cevheri Güven' against former police chiefs.

```html

After the statements of the secret witness Serdar Sertçelik regarding the case of the 'Ayhan Bora Kaplan' criminal organization in Ankara, former Deputy Provincial Police Chief Murat Çelik, who was suspended and arrested, and released 4 months later, former Organized Crime Department Head Kerem Gökay Öner, and former Deputy Department Head Şevket Demircan, an indictment was prepared regarding 'FETÖ'.

ALLEGATION THAT THEY LEAKED INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS TO FETÖ FUGITIVE CEVAHİR GÜVEN

Within the scope of the investigation conducted by the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, an indictment was prepared against the suspects for 'committing crimes on behalf of the organization without being a member of it', 'abuse of office', and 'violation of confidentiality', on the grounds that they provided information and documents to FETÖ fugitive Cevahir Güven. The indictment was accepted by the Ankara 17th High Criminal Court. Separate prison sentences ranging from 9 years and 6 months to 21 years and 6 months were requested for the defendants.

LINKS TO THE ORGANIZATION COULD NOT BE DETECTED

The indictment stated that the suspects Kerem Gökay Öner, Murat Çelik, and Şevket Demircan did not use the Bylock program, which is a secure messaging application used by FETÖ/PDY members, and that no evidence indicating their connection and affiliation with the organization could be found. It was noted in the indictment that the suspects Murat Çelik and Kerem Gökay Öner did not have any accounts in Bank Asya, and that the account of suspect Şevket Demircan, which was opened in Bank Asya in 2007, had not been used since 2013. It was also stated that the suspects did not have any investigations related to the FETÖ/PDY armed terrorist organization.

THEY WERE RECORDED AS VIOLATING CONFIDENTIALITY DECISIONS

The indictment recorded that the documents related to the investigation file of the 'Ayhan Bora Kaplan' criminal organization were shared by the suspects with other individuals despite the confidentiality decision, before the investigation was completed and the relevant documents became public, thus violating the confidentiality decisions. It was noted that while the activities and actions of suspects Murat Çelik, Kerem Gökay Öner, and Şevket Demircan reflected in the file could not be identified as actions indicating their inclusion in the hierarchical structure of the organization, they committed crimes of violation of confidentiality and abuse of office by taking advantage of the ease provided by their duties, thereby violating the confidentiality of decisions that should be kept secret against the parties involved in the investigation.

STATEMENT MINUTES AND ATTACHMENTS PUBLISHED AS IS

The indictment stated that when examining the statement minutes belonging to Bora Kaplan obtained from the materials of suspect Serkan Dinçer, it was recorded that the last page was signed by the officer who took the statement. When examining the videos published by FETÖ fugitive Cevahir Güven on his YouTube channel titled 'The scandal of the year in the intelligence building' and 'The man who brought down Soylu and his gang'; it was noted that the statement minutes and attachments belonging to Bora Kaplan obtained from the digital materials of Serkan Dinçer were published as is.

3 SEPARATE ALLEGATIONS WERE MADE

According to the evidence obtained in the indictment, it was stated that the suspects did not hold a position in the organizational hierarchy, and no evidence was obtained at this stage indicating that they were members of the organization, and their actions did not contain continuity, diversity, and intensity that would constitute the basis for acceptance of membership in an armed terrorist organization. However, it was determined that they acted to benefit the organization, and in this context, despite the confidentiality decision, they facilitated the publication of documents related to the investigation file on the YouTube channel of the organization member named Cevahir Güven before they became public. The indictment stated that the suspects constituted the crimes of 'committing crimes on behalf of the organization without being a member of it', 'abuse of office', and 'violation of confidentiality', and that sufficient evidence was obtained to raise reasonable suspicion that would necessitate the opening of a public case against them.