14.05.2025 12:20
The meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Syrian President Ahmed al-Shara, who is on the terrorism list, at the summit held in Riyadh hosted by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has sparked harsh criticism in the American press. This situation has been described as an example of inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy.
```html
US President Donald Trump's meeting in Riyadh, hosted by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, with Syrian President Ahmed al-Shara, who was on the US terrorism list until last year, has sparked harsh criticism in the American press.
Washington Post described Trump's move as an "example of inconsistency in foreign policy" with the headline "From Terror to the Table: Trump's Questionable Diplomacy." The newspaper stated, "Discussing the Abraham Accords today with a leader who was defined as a terrorist until yesterday undermines the US's international credibility."
New York Times, in its analysis titled "Democracy and Human Rights Forgotten," stated, "Meeting with a leader held responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in Syria shows that the US prioritizes pragmatic interests over its values."
Liberal media outlets accused Trump of "flirting with dictators," while conservative channels like Fox News defended the meeting as "a pragmatic step towards peace in the Middle East." Fox News commentator Sean Hannity stated, "Trump's bold diplomacy will strengthen Israel's security in the region."
Reactions from Congress were swift. Democratic senators stated, "His removal from the terrorism list does not absolve al-Shara of the crimes he committed," while some Republican figures also took a cautious stance towards the meeting.
The White House spokesperson responded to the criticisms, stating, "The President's priority is to achieve lasting peace in the region and protect US interests. Diplomacy sometimes requires difficult decisions."
```